MikeP
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2005
- Messages
- 8,674
- Status
- OTHER
- Hatteras Model
- Not Currently A Hatteras Owner
Re blueprinting - As I said, I have never blueprinted a diesel engine so I am baseing my 20% improvement in power and effeciency AND engine life on doing this with lots of gas engines. Since, as has been pointed out, these DDs are old designs and machining, I would think the same gains are possible.
However, I will readily admit that I don't know the level of assembly care that was done on a typical DD. But I find it hard to believe that there was any attempt to keep an engine to any better than the same factory specs that are shown in the service manual for all the various clearances, etc.
There is plenty of evidence for the sometimes dramatic differences blueprinting can make. I think I posted once before of picking up nearly 100HP on a 426 Hemi by just blueprinting with absolutely NO non - oem parts added. Admittedly, that was an extreme example. Something on the order of 40-50HP was a minimum gain for a big block being blueprinted.
However, I will readily admit that I don't know the level of assembly care that was done on a typical DD. But I find it hard to believe that there was any attempt to keep an engine to any better than the same factory specs that are shown in the service manual for all the various clearances, etc.
There is plenty of evidence for the sometimes dramatic differences blueprinting can make. I think I posted once before of picking up nearly 100HP on a 426 Hemi by just blueprinting with absolutely NO non - oem parts added. Admittedly, that was an extreme example. Something on the order of 40-50HP was a minimum gain for a big block being blueprinted.