Just cut it out already and delete this thread. It's abusive to us owners.
A CG 44 MLB a boat designed for rescue purposes a boat that can withstand a 360 degree roll. My comments were in response to your opinion that a 46 Hatt was a better choice than a 60 in nasty wether remember you said they were a better choice because they're lighter and will stay on top. Here are your words in case you forgot.
"If I had my choice to lay off shore in nasty weather would be the 46. It has higher freeboard so you don't take waves in the cockpit and its lighter and bobs over the waves"
I didn't think we were talking about a purpose built boat like the 44 MLBs and neither did you. You've now become desperate and sound even more foolish than you did earlier. I think your most recent comments speak volumes about your knowledge of boats and your judgement in general. Now I'm hoping that you were lying about all your experience because the thought of you running a boat with paying passengers in anything but a lily pond is freightning.
This is an EXTREMELY useful thread for future hat owners. LOVE both the enclosed bridge and old school 53 sportsfish.
I wanted to know which boat, lying dead in the water, way off shore (Not something normal people would do), would be less rolly. I got my answer.
Why is everyone so concerned about rolling? We all know that if you let the seas hit you broadside, your boat will roll. Steer your course accordingly and zig-zag if necessary. If you lose power for whatever reason, deploy a sea anchor. Cheeezzz do we have to invite a few sail boaters here to instruct us.
Now all you children go to your rooms....no dinner for you tonight.
Walt
I don't think you got anything of true value yet. You have 2 opinions. Nether opinion was conclusive on roll. None of the conditions were the same. They were only opinions. Until you have facts and figures your only going to get opinions. Your not likely going to get any facts or figs they probably don't exist. But if you can get 50 plus opinions you would have a lot more information and could compare somewhat. Two opinions is nothing. None of the opinions came with facts only comments. Not that either opinion was bad or fraud. They were only opinions. In my opinion I don't think you got your answer. Maybe you should buy or rent one of each boat and form your own opinion.![]()
BILL
Bill I agree opinions are not facts and they should always be viewed with caution especially when you don't have first hand knowledge of the writers experience or credibility. I did get the results of the stability tests for both vessels and the results are very clear and conclusive. The 60C has much better stability than the 53 which to me makes sense because it's a wider heavier boat. It also shows that the difference in stability between the enclosed bridge and the open bridge is to small to be a factor in real world use.
The stability test is basically a measurement of how much the boat wants to return to a level plane after being rolled and how much force it takes to roll it to a specific point. I would think that is the best way to determine just how much a boat will roll while drifting in a beam sea or running. I guess it's possible to find a sea condition were a narrower lighter boat may perform better than a wider heavier boat but it's got to be a rare ocurance.[/QUOTEI
I don't have ether boat, Just a 43DC, but I do agree with the info you presented. Any time you have a wider boat the wide boat should win. Width is the biggest factor and keel depth is the next. I don't believe that length means anything. The width tries to keep the boat level and the keel tries to keep the boat upright. Of course that's my opinion.Skinny boats work best in ruff water by entering the wave. Wide boats tend to ride on top.
BILL
Why is everyone so concerned about rolling? We all know that if you let the seas hit you broadside, your boat will roll. Steer your course accordingly and zig-zag if necessary. If you lose power for whatever reason, deploy a sea anchor. Cheeezzz do we have to invite a few sail boaters here to instruct us.
Now all you children go to your rooms....no dinner for you tonight.
Walt
Bill I agree opinions are not facts and they should always be viewed with caution especially when you don't have first hand knowledge of the writers experience or credibility. I did get the results of the stability tests for both vessels and the results are very clear and conclusive. The 60C has much better stability than the 53 which to me makes sense because it's a wider heavier boat. It also shows that the difference in stability between the enclosed bridge and the open bridge is to small to be a factor in real world use.
The stability test is basically a measurement of how much the boat wants to return to a level plane after being rolled and how much force it takes to roll it to a specific point. I would think that is the best way to determine just how much a boat will roll while drifting in a beam sea or running. I guess it's possible to find a sea condition were a narrower lighter boat may perform better than a wider heavier boat but it's got to be a rare ocurance.
Maybe we should only accept information as being credible from people that actually own the specific model in question? There are enough members on this forum that can give a good idea on how a model boat handles, etc.
As far as engines go, people with experience with specific engines (ie. Detroit Diesel, Catepillar, MTU, etc.) may comment based on their experience.
As an owner of a 1980 60' EB Sportfish (non-stablized), we've already been hit hard enough in this economy, so we don't need people bashing each other and our beautiful vintage Hatteri. You get a few people Googling these models and you'll kill any market for some seller out there. It's up to their brokers and their pocketbooks to determine how much they want to sell their boats for. Each person uses their boat differently. We are not commercial fishermen, otherwise we would have a trawler and drag a net off the transom. We are sportfishermen. We can pick and choose when we want to go fishing. As far as being an enclosed flybridge, that's what they make all those nifty new cameras for so that you can still see what's going on down in the cockpit as well as aft of the transom. Handling the boat from inside or the aft deck of the flybridge is no worse than cockpit controls where you have the whole house in front of you as an obstruction.
Just cut it out already and delete this thread. It's abusive to us owners.
OK OK THE 60 CLOSED BRIDGE IS THE MOST PERFECT BOAT HATTERAS EVER MADE! NOW THE REAL ONES WHO ARE KILLING THE VALUES OF THESE BOATS THAT WE ALL LOVE ARE THE THUGS WHO HAVE BEEN RUNNING WASHINGTON SINCE 2006. GET RID OF PELOSI, REID AND OBAMA AND YOUR BOAT MIGHT BE WORTH SOMETHING AGAIN.
OK OK THE 60 CLOSED BRIDGE IS THE MOST PERFECT BOAT HATTERAS EVER MADE! NOW THE REAL ONES WHO ARE KILLING THE VALUES OF THESE BOATS THAT WE ALL LOVE ARE THE THUGS WHO HAVE BEEN RUNNING WASHINGTON SINCE 2006. GET RID OF PELOSI, REID AND OBAMA AND YOUR BOAT MIGHT BE WORTH SOMETHING AGAIN.
Would the moderators shit this down now please
WHY IS IT PEOPLE CAN NOT HANDLE THE TRUTH? THIS IS THE TYPICAL RESPONSE TO SHUT PEOPLE UP.I AM THE ONE WHO HAS BORNE THE BRUNT OF PERSONAL ATTACKS ON MY EXPERIENCE AND CREDIBILITY.