You have bent rods from hydro locking the motor. It was the only thing that made any sense. There are only two ways that happened, the likeliest being wave action up the exhaust. My dock neighbors stuff balls in the exhausts to prevent this, if the engine’s not running I don’t see why you couldn’t use that trick underway.
Sorry, just does not seem that this is the case. The evidence just does not support it as far as I can tell. The hydrolock theory just doesn't make any sense given what we are seeing.
Sure, if you look at ONLY the bent rod 'hydrolock' is the easy off-the-cuff response, but when you actually LOOK at the evidence....
It appears the piston welded/galled itself to the cylinder wall at the bottom of it's stroke when the engine originally seized. The rod may have bent on original seize, or it may have bent when we re-started the engine. When we re-started (the already seized) engine I'm thinking the cylinder skirt broke off likely from a rod strike or from the galled ring pulling away from it (or combination of the two)
The engine only ran a few seconds with a bent rod after being re-crancked. The marks on the crank/block show very limited strikes, so it only ran this way for a few seconds, which would align with the amount of time we ran the engine on re-crank.
The engine was seized from running without lubrication. By attempting to re-crank (thinking it was just the starter) we probably broke the liner and bent the rod. Really lucky we didn't cause more damage.
The bent rod was in cylinder #1 on port side. It is the highest, and furthest forward cylinder. The water would have had to run uphill 3 different times to get into this cylinder. If I put a water hose in my exhaust manifold, this would be the last cylinder to fill with water. It was the only cylinder to show damage. How does all that water get past 3 cylinders and run uphill multiple times? On a day that was lake calm.
Again, I'm all for alternative diagnosis but when the hard evidence does not support the theory I cannot just blindly accept. There was no water in cylinder 1, only galled cylinder walls, welded rings and heat lines around the cylinder where the piston was galled in place.
So, again, just to clarify... When we pushed the button to crank the engine (after all the smoke cleared) the engine was already seized. The crank barely even budged when she hit the starter (I was looking at it). The engine was already locked down HARD. So, in your hydrolock scenario, how in the world could water get all the way through the muffler, up the exhaust incline, through the turbo, down the exhaust elbow, UP the exhaust manifold (somehow going past 3 cylinders) and into and fill up the forward most cylinder. Which appears to have been at it's down-stroke (intake ports open) when it seized. I'm always one for a good conspiracy but it just doesn't make any sense.
A hydro-lock does not score/gall trash all the cylinders and bearings from lack of lubrication. A hydro-lock does not smoke up the entire cabin and engine room. Both of which are undeniable symptoms we experienced. An engine running in reverse rotation does present both of these symptoms.