But see, that's the point. It wasn't correct. It ended up the way you describe it, with one inch difference between the leading edges and the shaft center distance.
This is how it happened: My rudder arms are keyed 7° offset. So if you put the arm on one way it makes the rudder kick to the right of center. If you flip it over it kicks left. After the repair the yard put them on upside down so the trailing edges were kicked out 5" from the leading edges. If I flipped them over the leading edges were 1/2" wider than the trailing edges. This is the way Hatteras built the boat. The yard didn't "set" anything. No adjustments had been or could be made. The tie-rod ends were female tapered pipe thread onto male taper threaded pipe. Made once and stayed that way.
Offset reduces steering effort by partially balancing the water forces on the front and back of the rudders. If anything it would increase flutter which is why we use toe to load the linkages. For loading purposes water force acts across the entire surface of the rudder, not just the forward offset. So I don't understand why you think you need all that toe to stop flutter. It is a HUGE amount of toe. You're describing exactly the toe I had and it created a very effective speed-brake.
I also don't understand your answer to Sky's post where you refer to center lines, offset from center and which rudder to adjust first. The tie-rod adjustment only sets the relationship between the two rudders, not their relation to center. Center is adjusted with the ram linkage, unless your steering linkages are very different from mine.
BTW, the person at Hatteras that I spoke to was in agreement with you about toe-out vs. toe-in. He stated that toe-out had a tendency to make boats wander and gave the autopilot a hard time. In automotive steering geometry this is certainly correct. I don't know if it works the same with fluids, but I ended up re-making my tie-rod to achieve toe-in.