HOF HIN's

[Freeebird]

Tom, unfortunately you'll just have to get used to it like the rest of us have because that's just the way he is. He has been run off of here (and other sites) more than once but he always manages to come back, often under a different screen name (notice the original poster of this thread is actually Randy under someone else's name that he took over). Time has proven that we simply cannot get rid of him. He will argue any point he can, and then change up the wording to argue a different point when he is proven wrong. Agruing with us and anyone he can get to pay attention to him is sport to him because he has nothing better to do with his time.

I posted these pics of HIN plates simply to disprove his statement of there being no such thing as a HIN plate and that all HIN's by law must be engraved on any boats transom after 1972. I am in a large marina right now and could post pics of different HIN plates until I am blue in the face, but Randy will argue that they must all be illegals. He says the '86 Viking is illegal and somehow not a HIN plate because there is no space between the 12-character HIN and the CV at the end which simply shows the model as a convertible. What a joke.

The fact remains that HIN plates do exist, they are used by many manufacturers for decades and they are perfectly legal, PERIOD.

First, I have never been "run off" this site. Yeah, I'm really hiding something with listing my previous usernames in my signature! I've got news for you ThirdFace, Doug always knew who Sparky was, and there was never any doubt who Freeebird was. Don't believe me?... ask him.

You on the other hand have played both ends against the middle as long as I've been on this site. You are the epitome of a hypocrite who has gone as far as to call me on the phone to encourage me to post something negative about other members who don't live up to your "standards". I trust I don't need to expand on that.

 

[ThirdHatt]

First, I have never been "run off" this site. Yeah, I'm really hiding something with listing my previous usernames in my signature! I've got news for you ThirdFace, Doug always knew who Sparky was, and there was never any doubt who Freeebird was. Don't believe me?... ask him.

You on the other hand have played both ends against the middle as long as I've been on this site. You are the epitome of a hypocrite who has gone as far as to call me on the phone to encourage me to post something negative about other members who don't live up to your "standards". I trust I don't need to expand on that.

ROFL! Hook, line and sinker!

So, what's your point this time FREEEBOATRIDE???

Shouldn't you be installing a battery charger, or changing impellers, or....oh, I forgot....you're nursing your feet. Good luck with that!

 

[Avenger]

You guys really should rent a room.

 

[ThirdHatt]

You guys really should rent a room.

I can imagine how that would go.........

 

[SKYCHENEY]

Wanna take a bet on who has the last word on this?

 

[ThirdHatt]

Wanna take a bet on who has the last word on this?

LOL! Sky, I learned long ago to NEVER take that bet when we're dealing with Randy. He has proudly admitted before that he must have the last word. Now, that doesn't mean that I don't have fun testing that from time to time.

 

[yachtsmanbill]

I just love the way that you guys BAIT each other... I already know for a fact that randall is a master baiter, but you Byron, are the master angler! ws

 

[SKYCHENEY]

I just love the way that you guys BAIT each other... I already know for a fact that randall is a master baiter, but you Byron, are the master angler! ws

And you, Bill, are the Master Card..................... priceless.

 

[yachtsmanbill]

Ill take a bow for that one SKY! ws

 

[ppat324]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LVtlwkPxs4

 

[Freeebird]

I'll ask one more question which will pretty much ensure I won't have the last word on this topic. The ThirdFace thing is pretty self-explanatory, but what am I missing with the Freeboatride thing?

Funny how the ignore feature doesn't work when you're not logged in.

 

[rsmith]

Back to the hull # question Our 1965 34 was hull sc-157 and the 1967 50 is 50c-305 I always thought the 34 was the 157th hull hatt made and the 50 was the 305th hull made, inclusive of all size and model varients( in 65 I think there was only the 34/41/and 50my) Yet I saw one of the posts said their '66 34' was #068. Was there any sence to these #s?