Sam's is your source for Hatteras and Cabo Yacht parts.

Enter a part description OR part number to search the Hatteras/Cabo parts catalog:

Email Sam's or call 1-800-678-9230 to order parts.

This is why you NEED paper charts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaxfishgyd
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 9
  • Views Views 3,320

Jaxfishgyd

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Messages
2,442
Hatteras Model
43' DOUBLE CABIN (1970 - 1984)
Stranded Navy minesweeper taking on water
By Christopher P. Cavas - Staff writer
Posted : Sunday Jan 20, 2013 14:25:53 EST
“Multiple spaces” are flooded aboard the minesweeper Guardian, still stranded on a reef in the Philippines since Jan. 17.

While the ship’s condition remains stable, a U.S. destroyer has arrived on the scene in the Sulu Sea and a salvage team headed by a rear admiral is being established as more ships and assets head to the area.

Weather conditions remain rough, and the ship, once pointed straight into the reef with her bow hard aground, has swung broadside on, where most of the starboard hull is in contact with the coral.

RELATED READING

Digital map error may have led to grounding (1/19)

Most crew off grounded minesweeper (1/18)

Minesweeper stuck on coral reef in Philippines (1/17)

As of Saturday night Eastern Standard Time, the ship experienced a “slight increase to a port list,” according to the Navy. But as of Sunday night Philippine time, there was no evidence the ship was taking on more water. Concerns persist, however, that the ship will sustain further damage.

No injuries have been reported, and the entire crew of 79 sailors was taken off the ship Jan. 17. No one has been back on board the Guardian, the Navy confirmed.

On Jan. 18, the service revealed that a digital chart used by the ship to navigate in the region misplaced the location of a reef by about eight nautical miles, and may have been a significant factor when the ship drove on to the reef on Jan. 17.

As of Jan. 18, U.S. Navy ships have been directed to “operate with caution” when using similar electronic charts and compare the map data with paper charts, which are considered accurate.

The Guardian drove onto Tubbataha Reef around 2:25 a.m. on Jan. 17 (some sources cite a date of Jan. 16, since that was the date in Washington, D.C., when the incident occurred; there is a 13-hour time difference between Washington and the reef). The reef is about 80 miles east-southeast of Palawan Island in the western portion of the Philippine archipelago.

CHECK FOR UPDATES

Intercepts, a Defense News blog

The ship was at Olongapo City in Subic Bay, and was en route to Indonesia when she struck the reef, according to the Navy. Earlier plans for the ship to refuel at Puerto Princessa in Palawan Island were cancelled before the Guardian left Subic Bay, the Navy said, and media reports that the minesweeper was bound for Puerto Princessa when she struck the reef are incorrect.

The Guardian is homeported at Sasebo, Japan.

The mine countermeasures vessel, with a wooden hull sheathed in fiberglass, has been taking on water and moving on the reef, and 79 crew members were taken off the ship on Jan. 18, 45 transferring to the Navy survey ship Bowditch and 34 sailors to the C-Champion, a commercial vessel chartered by the Navy’s Military Sealift Command.

The Guardian has not been abandoned, the Navy said, and the service said removal of the crew was a temporary safety measure. But the ship remains threatened by the weather, according to the Navy official. Rough, unpredictable seas coming from different directions added to the ship’s movement on the reef.

Aerial surveys by U.S. Navy P-3C Orion maritime surveillance aircraft indicated no fuel leaks and no additional flooding on the ship on Jan. 20, a Navy official said, although the hull continues to be battered, particularly on the port side.

The Japan-based destroyer Mustin arrived on the scene on Jan. 19 and is assisting, the Navy official said. A salvage assessment team is on board the Bowditch. On Jan. 20, 36 Guardian crewmembers were transferred to the Mustin, and as of the evening of Jan. 20, 35 sailors remain on the C-Champion with 8 on the Bowditch.

The Mustin departed the scene Jan. 20 for Puerto Princessa on Palawan Island to embark Rear Adm. Thomas Carney, commander of Task Force 73 and the U.S. Navy’s Singapore Area Commander, who will take charge of the salvage operation. The destroyer is expected to be back on scene with the Guardian by Jan. 21.

A Philippine salvage tug, the Trabajador, also is on the scene and assisting, as is the Philippine Coast Guard. The salvage ship is equipped with environmental container booms but has been unable to deploy them in the rough weather. Conditions are expected to improve Jan. 22, and the booms will be deployed when the weather permits, the Navy said.

Forecasts for the region over the next one to two days are for 15-to-20-knot winds and four-to-six-foot seas.

The Vos Apollo, an anchor-handling ship from Singapore, is expected to arrive at Puerto Princessa Jan. 21 to load lighterage and oil recovery equipment for the salvage operation, the Navy said.

Other U.S. Navy teams are gathering at Puerto Princessa to assist the operation, including a Seabee detachment, technicians from the Southwest Regional Maintenance Center, and a Navy marine chemist.

The Pearl Harbor-based salvage ship Salvor also is en route, although she is not expected on the scene until late next week.

DIGITAL ERROR
The Digital Nautical Charts (DNC) used by the Guardian and most Navy ships are produced by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), a largely secret organization headquartered in Springfield,Va.

The DNC charts come in several versions. “General” and “coastal” versions are used in open areas such as the Sulu Sea, and “approach” and “harbor” versions are used for operating in and around harbors. According to an NGA memo sent to the Navy on Jan. 18, the error was in the coastal DNC, apparently in use on board the Guardian at the time of the grounding.

The general DNC and hardcopy charts show the reef’s location correctly, NGA said.

Letitia Long, the agency’s director, told the Navy that the coastal DNC chart for the Sulu Sea would be corrected by Jan. 30, and advised ships not to use DNC coastal charts in the area until then.

The Navy’s head navigator took things a step further, advising in a message sent to the fleet Jan. 18 “to operate with caution when using NGA-supplied Coastal Digital Nautical Charts due to an identified error in the accuracy of charting in the Sulu Sea.”

Rear Adm. Jonathan White, Oceanographer and Navigator of the Navy, said in the message that preliminary analysis of the error indicates it “resulted from incorrect geographic rectification of satellite imagery used to build” the coastal DNC charts.

“NGA has found no other anomalies, but is currently conducting a comprehensive review of its source data,” White said in the message.

He cautioned Navy ships “to compare coastal DNC charts with general DNC library charts, and not rely on [a] single source for navigation data.

“Commanding officers,” White added, “are directed to report any anomalies immediately to NGA.”

The agency expects to complete its review of all coastal DNC charts by Jan. 22, White noted.

A Navy official cautioned that while the digital chart error may have contributed to the incident, an accident investigation is continuing.

“This guidance to the fleet does not presuppose the cause of the USS Guardian grounding,” the official said Jan. 18. “The investigation will look at a number of potential contributing factors.”

The Guardian is commanded by Lt. Cmdr. Mark Rice, who first reported to the ship in October 2011.

The 14-ship minesweeper fleet, which generally toils in obscurity, has become the focus of major refurbishment and modernization efforts with the delay of planned replacements, renewed concerns about anti-mine capabilities, and a surge deployment to the Persian Gulf.

Guardian is one of four ships forward-deployed to Japan and is assigned to Mine Countermeasures Squadron 7. Four other mine countermeasures ships are homeported at Bahrain, where four San Diego-based ships also are operating. Two others remain at San Diego, home base for the mine force.
 
I agree completely.

Unfortunately, the skipper may wear the brunt of the investigation regardless of the DNC chart error.

At the moment, my daughter is in the process of officer selection for the Royal Australian Navy to train as a Maritime Warfare Officer/Navigator so I have been drumming the importance of paper charts into her and to not rely solely on electronics.

Electronic charts are fantastic but I prefer to cross reference two or three sources of information.

I know she'll also get this focus during her training but a head start is always a bonus.
 
HAVING paper charts on board would do nothing to prevent such a thing unless you actually use them instead of the GPS. And really...who is going to do that? We have paper charts on board and I have to admit I have never pulled them out to compare with the GPS chart plotter. My reason to carry them is not because I plan to cross check the GPS; they are there in case the GPS fails.

It's hard for me to imagine that anyone uses both and systematically compares/cross checks them. Not saying it wouldn't be a laudable thing to do...just can't believe anybody does it.
 
I typically use my chart plotter and always have a paper chart book open as well. I'm a big picture kinda guy and the screen on that plotter doesn't show me enough. I like the data that the plotter supplies, like speed and heading. But, nothing trumps a paper chart IMO.
 
We aren't "master mariners" by any stretch of the imagination but in unknown waters, we always cross-reference our reported position on the paper chart to confirm. That is ( I believe) de rigeur so assume the person on the bridge with watch command won't be remaining in the Navy for long.
 
I didn't mean the post as a "slam" at the Navy.. They had no reason not to believe their chart plotter. I just wanted it to show why those at our level should not trust solely on our chart plotters and ignore paper charts
 
On passages of more than a couple of hours or so, I have a Maptech chartbook open at the helm, and mark position, speed and course on it about every hour, or at any course or speed changes if in open water, as well as enter in the log. Also annotate any unusual items of interest like new shoals not shown. I too like the easy to read big picture. Plus it is fun to go back and see where you were on different trips. If I were to lose the electronics, it is easy to figure out where I am.

I don't rely on the plotters much in bad visibility, rather use radar, especially in narrow channels. The plotters have shown the boat gliding along on dry land many a time on the ICW or in the California Delta.
 
If there is an error that makes the chart on the electromachine thingy, isn't it feasible that the same error could be in the machine that makes the paper chart thingy?

In theory, an updated paper chart should likely have the exact same information on it as a digital chart, right?
 
Consider how many people are on board doing nothing. There is no excuse for this to happen. Surely someone could be constantly cross checking against the paper charts. Especially when there are coral reefs in the navigation area. Lots of tax payer dollars exposed.
 
"In theory, an updated paper chart should likely have the exact same information on it as a digital chart, right?"

Yes, the digital charts are derived from the NOAA paper charts so in theory they are the same if bot the dig and paper are the latest versions. Frankly, in my experience, both of those assumptions are unlikely. The only system that I have that automatically updates the dig app with the latest NOAA paper chart is on my iPad. So therefore, if you are looking at an Ipad with a chart app like MacEnc, you ARE looking at the latest paper chart...subject to unknown download or electronic glitches... ;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
38,156
Messages
448,741
Members
12,482
Latest member
UnaVida

Latest Posts

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom