How is simulator training a bad thing? And what's wrong with playing with flight sims.....? If you cannot afford to own your own plane or afford the rental time to maintain proficiency they can be quite useful. Flight students apparently find them to be very helpful.
And if you don't, for whatever reason, have a pilots ticket, good sims can be very immersive and an enjoyable pastime as well as a shared father-son hobby. One that can continue to be enjoyed for decades after one is physically unable to pilot a real aircraft......
BTW one of the highlights of my time with McDonnell-Douglas was the hour spent in the C-17 simulator one night in Long Beach. I even got a try at a takeoff, go-around and landing.
Wow! I think the point I was trying to make was these folks equated video games with actual piloting skills.
Multiple Choice:
Q. Someone with 3,000 hours on Nintendo has...
a) No problem with a C17 simulator
b) An instrument rating for the space shuttle
c) A bunch of frequent flyer miles
d) Absolutely no actual flying experience at all, but a great family life
Hell, they probably go IFR on rainy days. These guys told people about their flying experiences. I'm pretty sure you need some actual hours in a real airplane before being licensed and honing your skills with appropriate simulations. The key word being
appropriate. I'm thinking the C17 simulator over in Long Beach was a might more sophisticated than the X-box in the split-level ranch in Bamberg, SC. But the father/son bonding thing was probably accurate.
The most important thing anyone can know, in my opinion, is knowing what you don't know. These guys have no clue. I took the son, 40-ish, to a live pigeon shoot one day. He considered himself a pretty good wing-shot and wanted to go. I warned him about the pigeon game and the license plates from way out west and the calcuttas worth tens of thousands. He shot shot five practice birds and said he was as good a shot as any of them. I haven't seen him since.