Sam's is your source for Hatteras and Cabo Yacht parts.

Enter a part description OR part number to search the Hatteras/Cabo parts catalog:

Email Sam's or call 1-800-678-9230 to order parts.

Optimum Fuel Efficiency RPM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pete
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 8
  • Views Views 5,593

Pete

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
1,167
Status
  1. OWNER - I own a Hatteras Yacht
Hatteras Model
48' LRC (1976 - 1981)
We all know that the slower you go the greater your NMPG. And the numbers are dramatic. Cut your speed in half and your NMPG will way more than double. But, seldom do we consider other dimensions of this action. One additional dimension is the fuel efficiency of the engines at various power outputs. Taking DD natural and turbo engines as examples, does anyone have EFFICIENCY power curves that show efficiency versus RPM or even better efficiency versus horsepower output? Such information may make it possible to find "sweet spots" for fuel efficiency. And, in my opinion, the standard horsepower and propeller load versus RPM sheets that DD publish do not have this level of detail. Performance measurements for mechanical devices are never as smooth as those curves.

Pete
 
Slowing the boat makes it more efficient because of the hydrodynamics of the hull. Slowing the engine below around 75% of rated output make the engine less efficient the further down the range you go the more efficiency you lose. The DD power curves will show this but as you said not in great detail. There are so many variables in play I think the only way you find the very best MPG or GPM would be to experiment with the boat. Flowscans sure come in handy for that.

Brian
 
somewhere out there should be a BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) curve for various RPMS. That would at least help you get starting point.
 
Any speed beyond displacement speeds doubles your fuel consumption in nmpg. The only time you are concerned about this is when you are going somewhere. If you are just going for a boat ride for an hour or so, you want to look at your gph, (gallons per hour) figures.
 
Well, the slower you go, the better your MPG. But who can deal with idling at 5K? But if you can, our 53MY will go 2000nm on a tank of fuel!
 
If you are happy with 5 knots.

Keep in mind, all the sailboats you see up to 35" are going 5 knots, or less. And in a 10 hour day you change your location by a mere 50 miles, at 5 knots. I've found that my best fuel burn is at about 9 knots, when I can that is the speed I run.

JM
 
Well, the slower you go, the better your MPG. But who can deal with idling at 5K? But if you can, our 53MY will go 2000nm on a tank of fuel!


That's not always true. My boat gets it's best fuel milage at 8.5 kts. Remember I'm over proped so that's only 850 RPM for me. Below or above that milage gets worse.

Brian
 
Fuel saving approaches.....
From a practical point of view your range of efficiency options is usually limited...say 1,000 RPM to 1,500 RPM or so for 2 cycle Detroits...Planing at high speed/high RPM in our heavy hulls isn't efficient nor is trying to creep along at four or five knots....so the mid range option's involve slight engine efficiency trade offs with significant hull efficiency improvements at moderate speeds. Hull speed rules.

The practical answer is that for most of our hulls in the 45 to 58 foot range likely 7 or 8 knots would be best, but that's a bit too slow for my 8V71TI's/48 YF....engines...exhaust temps would be too low...so a compromise at 8 to 11 knot range depending on HP, length, etc is about a good as it gets....maybe naturals have a slightly larger cruising RPM range choice. In my case 10 to 11 knots balances all this.

HOWEVER: if you cruise in tidal currents, running with the current instead of against the current can make a significant difference.....In eastern LI sound for example, (especially Plum Gut and along the LI shore east of Mattituck) currents run over three knots....so if you get your lard out of the bunk early and run with the current you may gain 6 knots versus sleeping til noon and opposing the same strength current.

In Maine, if you are running into bays,estuaries, rivers, do so on an incoming tide....tides vary there over ten feet, closer to 12 feet "down east" and while the currents are usually moderate, it can make a difference when running for several hours. The "mighty Kennebeck", for example, has strong tidal currents.
(That's the river featured in the TV documentary of an Arleigh Burke class destroyer being launched and run for a shakedown cruise....from the Bath Iron Works)

The other main thing that comes to mind: clean running gear. Keep props and shafts and rudder clean of mussels and barnacles, for efficiency. Keep underwater intakes clear for proper operation of machinery.

And has been discussed here in other threads, large diameter props and oversized blade area can help efficiency at moderate RPM.

If you do not cruise in tropical temperatures where a genny must be run for A/C, traveling every few days can also reduce genny run time and genny fuel use. Instead of an all day trip, for example, every five or six days, a run of a few hours more often heats water, charges batteries, and may help keep the boat warm in cooler cruising weather...all of which might reduce genny run time, wear and tear and fuel consumption.

Another option is to keep a portable gas genny aboard. I have a 4KW gas genny under a fabric cover in my cockpit....I use it to charge batteries in hot weather which keeps big diesel genny heat out of the boat....I originally bought it for cold weather cruising security...one pull and I knew I would have power.... but I found it smart to use it for light duty in hot weather. Now that gas is cheaper than diesel, this makes even more economic sense.
 
hi - i did a informal test last year in my 86 63' cpmy. i normally cruise at 2000 rpm at 18.5 mph. i tried 1800 rpm at ~ 16 mph. my gph went down but the travel time went up. i estimated the mpg the same. these were at planing speeds. also i found that at the slower speeds the trim angle has a huge effect on mpg.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
38,156
Messages
448,741
Members
12,482
Latest member
UnaVida

Latest Posts

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom