garyd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
- Messages
- 774
- Hatteras Model
- 41' CONVERTBLE-Series II (1986 - 1991)
Well got the oil analysis back from the lab after calling them since it did not show up. Techy said looks very good kinda surprized. I'm not a chemist so here they are.
This oil analysis was from 110 hours of usage and at least 65 hours at 800 rpm and another 10-15 hours at 425-550rpm. The remaining hours were at 1776, 1850, 1901, and (2000, 2200 for very short runs less than 5 minutes).
625hp DDEC, props 25x29, 800 rpm 8.2 kts, 1776 rpm 22kts 1850 24kts 1901 rpm 25kts all loaded for vacation.
Once we got to Cat Cay we just went slow 600 rpm start up, 550 fast idle, 425 slow idle manuvering out of slip 550 rpm away from slip still in and around other boats/channel etc then 800 rpm for hours and hours till we arrived at our destination, then 550 rpm, then 425 rpm, then cool down and shut down. We did that for 2 and 1/2 weeks. Never went over 800 rpm.
Just before we got back to Cat Cay coming home I started to run it up to cruise rpm but had to stop around 1350 cause the dingy was starting to catch air. We were towing it. I slowly went from 800 to 1350 in 100 rpm increments. There was black smoke at each bump but it would clear pretty fast. The next day we left Cat Cay with the dink securley tied to the transom (weaver davits). After fully warmed up I slowly brought it to 1776 rpm. It did not smoke up through 1350 but then smoked at each 100 rpm interval up to 1776 at each interval the smoke cleared quickly and we stayed at 1776 rpm, smooth water at first and finished in 2'-4' waves.
We added no oil since the oil change. But it could of used two quarts per at the end but since I was going to change it anyway why waste a gallon of oil.
So here is the oil analysis average between engines. Almost all numbers were down compared to previous oil analysis's except Na which was about double what it has been in the past.
Al 2
Ca 2080
Cr 2.5
Cu 4
Fe 56
Pb 2
Mg 28.5
Mo 1
P 850
K 3
Si 10
Na 28
Sn 8
Zn 1060
WAF N v100 14.3
interesting v100 previous 15.3
Shell Rolla 40wt
So any of you'all with a great deal of oil analysis experience see anything bad about these numbers from going s l o w ?
This oil analysis was from 110 hours of usage and at least 65 hours at 800 rpm and another 10-15 hours at 425-550rpm. The remaining hours were at 1776, 1850, 1901, and (2000, 2200 for very short runs less than 5 minutes).
625hp DDEC, props 25x29, 800 rpm 8.2 kts, 1776 rpm 22kts 1850 24kts 1901 rpm 25kts all loaded for vacation.
Once we got to Cat Cay we just went slow 600 rpm start up, 550 fast idle, 425 slow idle manuvering out of slip 550 rpm away from slip still in and around other boats/channel etc then 800 rpm for hours and hours till we arrived at our destination, then 550 rpm, then 425 rpm, then cool down and shut down. We did that for 2 and 1/2 weeks. Never went over 800 rpm.
Just before we got back to Cat Cay coming home I started to run it up to cruise rpm but had to stop around 1350 cause the dingy was starting to catch air. We were towing it. I slowly went from 800 to 1350 in 100 rpm increments. There was black smoke at each bump but it would clear pretty fast. The next day we left Cat Cay with the dink securley tied to the transom (weaver davits). After fully warmed up I slowly brought it to 1776 rpm. It did not smoke up through 1350 but then smoked at each 100 rpm interval up to 1776 at each interval the smoke cleared quickly and we stayed at 1776 rpm, smooth water at first and finished in 2'-4' waves.
We added no oil since the oil change. But it could of used two quarts per at the end but since I was going to change it anyway why waste a gallon of oil.
So here is the oil analysis average between engines. Almost all numbers were down compared to previous oil analysis's except Na which was about double what it has been in the past.
Al 2
Ca 2080
Cr 2.5
Cu 4
Fe 56
Pb 2
Mg 28.5
Mo 1
P 850
K 3
Si 10
Na 28
Sn 8
Zn 1060
WAF N v100 14.3
interesting v100 previous 15.3
Shell Rolla 40wt
So any of you'all with a great deal of oil analysis experience see anything bad about these numbers from going s l o w ?
Last edited: