MANs are the preferred power for most Viking buyers. They are great engines when all is well but you spend a fortune when things need to be fixed. A friend of mine is looking at a 2003 Viking SF. Owner just spent 40K doing the 2000 hour service and nothing was wrong with them. Why did you choose the Viking over that 74 CPMY Hatt at Bradford? Sounds like the Hatt was a good deal.
Holy #$%@&! ...$40K just for service......amazing. I wonder exactly what the tech does that causes the service to be that high ?
MAN's turn up on Vikings after 1992 often enough due to some relationship between the companies. In fact 1000 hp MAN's were standard on the 1993 Viking 65 CP MY we bought, but luckily the original owner opted for 900 hp Detroits on this one.
As to not making an offer on the Hatt 74...at the time I was dead set against going larger than 60 feet and larger than 8v92 engines...so it was just too much to comprehend going that large. Plus Bradford had a contract on it the week after we toured it, so it was no longer available anyway.
I was still wobbly about going 65 feet and 12 cylinder engines, hence my little story about inquiring on the super restored narrow beam Hatt 58 In Harrison Township, MI (Dionysus.. sp?) before I finalized the deal on the Viking.
Having said that, if I had known then that 12v71TA's are not as intimidating as I thought they would be, and that we'd find an excellent dockage at low price per foot I might have tried for the Hatt 74...but I'd still cringe at transient dockage prices, haul out and bottom paint costs, etc, etc...plus those pesky teak handrails to maintain* (the Viking has NO exterior teak)...
Still, that Hatt 74 CP MY was just amazing for the money. If we actually wanted one that big, we would have thought we'd died and gone to heaven. Having said that #2, it's always possible there was a hidden reason it was so low priced...perhaps some serious issue I missed on our brief tour. But I suspect really it's just that once you get above 70 feet everyone else has the same worries that we did about dockage** and future maintenance costs, so that limits the prices they can bring.
--------------
*which of course Dionysus and Nightingale have as well but being shorter, not so much of it !
**Not just the cost per foot but literally where you can dock it...some marinas flat out can't handle a yacht that large. Windmill Harbor on Hilton Head Island, SC for example....it wouldn't fit thru their lock and their longest docks are 70 feet (which is absolute length... including swim platform and bow pulpit.....FWIW, the Viking 65 is 69 feet including everything...that "short" because it has no bow pulpit....the anchor rests thru the bow hanging below, like on a ship)